The former Marine corporal could not consider that two generals and the protection secretary saved saying, over two days of confrontational hearings, that they had been "surprised" on the fast collapse of the Afghan military and the Taliban's takeover of Kabul with out a battle.
If that they had requested any enlisted member among the many greater than 800,000 U.S. troops who served in Afghanistan over 20 years, the brass would have identified that it was a foul guess to rely on the Afghan safety forces to supply cowl and time for the American withdrawal, mentioned Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz.
When it got here his flip for questions at a House Armed Services Committee listening to Wednesday, Gallego, an enlisted fight veteran of Iraq, advised Army Gen. Mark Milley, Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin that their belief within the Afghan military to carry off the Taliban was misplaced at greatest, particularly after the U.S. withdrew help and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani fled the nation.
He wished to know why U.S. intelligence seemed to be clueless on the dearth of resistance put up by a military educated and outfitted by the U.S. at a price estimated at $83 billion.
Gallego mentioned that "after speaking to a lot of service members, enlisted service members that have served for decades in and out of Afghanistan -- they were always telling me something extremely different from what I was getting from reports of many of you generals here, that the Afghan army was not ready, that they were not going to be sustainable on their own."
"You know, how did we miss that?" he requested. "How is it that a lot of 18-, 19-year-olds, mid-20-year-old E-5s were predicting this, yet some of our greatest minds, both on the civilian side and the uniformed side, absolutely missed this?"
Read Next: Senator Calls for Massive Investigation into What Went Wrong in Afghanistan
McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, agreed with Gallego and mentioned one of many classes discovered from the chaotic U.S. withdrawal was that prime commanders should do a greater job of listening to the issues within the ranks.
"I think it's a reasonable criticism," McKenzie mentioned. "We'll have to check out how we really stay linked to the people who find themselves down on the advisory stage.
"I'm conflicted by that as well, I'll be very candid with you," he advised Gallego. "And we will certainly take a look at that because I've heard that same strain myself. It's harder to get the truth as you become more senior. We, perhaps, need to look at ways that's conveyed in a more rapid and effective way. I'll accept that criticism."
The civility of the change between Gallego and the generals stood out in a rancorous listening to marked by indignant calls from Republicans on the committee for Milley, McKenzie and Austin to resign.
In his testimony Wednesday to the House, and on Tuesday to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Austin, a retired Army basic who served in prime instructions in Afghanistan and Iraq, mentioned, "The fact that the Afghan army we and our partners trained simply melted away -- in many cases without firing a shot -- took us all by surprise. It would be dishonest to claim otherwise."
Way too late, the U.S. army management got here to the belief that the $83 billion effort to coach and equip an Afghan safety power able to supporting and defending a democratic authorities in Kabul was basically flawed.
Milley mentioned in his testimony Tuesday and Wednesday that making an attempt to construct up an Afghan military within the "mirror image" of the U.S. army was destined to fail, however the warning indicators had been there nearly from the beginning.
U.S. and coalition advisers had been attacked repeatedly, both by Afghan troops themselves or by insurgents who infiltrated their ranks, in what got here to be often called insider assaults, or "green on blue" incidents.
Then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy pulled French troops out of Afghanistan in 2012 after 4 French troops had been shot and killed in an insider assault in japanese Afghanistan.
Sarkozy mentioned he couldn't proceed the mission when French service members had been being focused by the troops they got here to assist. France "is at the side of its allies, but we cannot accept that a single one of our soldiers be killed or wounded by our allies," he mentioned. "It is unacceptable; I will not accept it."
At the time, U.S. and coalition commanders turned so involved concerning the chance that their Afghan allies may activate them that they carried out further vetting procedures and designated some troopers as "guardian angels" to observe over their troops as they labored with the Afghans.
From 2007 to 2012, insider assaults killed 52 U.S. troops and wounded 48, in keeping with the Brookings Institution's Afghanistan Index, however the variety of assaults dropped off considerably as U.S. and coalition forces started withdrawing and diminished their fight position.
Still, the Afghan forces fought and died in staggering numbers regardless of the fixed criticism of their competence. The U.S. estimates that greater than 60,000 Afghan army and police had been killed.
The blame for the whole collapse of Afghan forces rests with the U.S., mentioned retired Army Lt. Col. Jason Dempsey, a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq and a senior adjunct fellow on the Center for a New American Security.
"We're the ones who built a national army in our image" with out making an allowance for the tradition and traditions of the Afghans, Dempsey mentioned.
"It was the easy thing and only thing for the [U.S. military] institution to do," he added. The outcome was that the U.S. ended up "pushing billions of dollars into unrealistic structures" and "contributed to the illegitimacy of the Afghan government and particularly its perceived illegitimacy in the eyes of the [Afghan] people."
"It briefed well in periodic reports to Congress]," Dempsey mentioned, "but was an absolute failure in execution. At end of day, we went along with this design for a national army for a nation that did not exist."
-- Richard Sisk could be reached at Richard.Sisk@Military.com.
Related: After Afghanistan: The Legacy of Two Decades of War
Show Full Article
© Copyright 2021 Military.com. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.